The Pale Blue Dot

On Valentine’s Day, 1990, Voyager 1, having completed its primary mission objectives, was ready to leave the Solar System. At the request of Carl Sagan, NASA got the spaceship to turn its camera back and take some parting shots of the planets. One photograph amongst them became famous as the ‘Pale Blue Dot‘ since our planet appeared on it as a pale pixel of light lost in the vastness of space. Carl used this photograph as a metaphor for our insignificance in the vast cosmic arena, on one hand and on the other, of how that dot of light was our only home.

A friend forwarded a link to a video by David Fu, who uses Carl’s voice and images from movies, sets it all to music, to create a very inspiring short film. (Thanks Joe!) The video is sure to leave you misty-eyed – I can vouch for that!

The text of Carl’s speech:

The spacecraft was a long way from home.

I thought it would be a good idea, just after Saturn, to have them take one last glance homeward. From Saturn, the Earth would appear too small for Voyager to make out any detail. Our planet would be just a point of light, a lonely pixel hardly distinguishable from the other points of light Voyager would see: nearby planets, far off suns. But precisely because of the obscurity of our world thus revealed, such a picture might be worth having.

It had been well understood by the scientists and philosophers of classical antiquity that the Earth was a mere point in a vast, encompassing cosmos—but no one had ever seen it as such. Here was our first chance, and perhaps also our last for decades to come.

So, here they are: a mosaic of squares laid down on top of the planets in a background smattering of more distant stars. Because of the reflection of sunlight off the spacecraft, the Earth seems to be sitting in a beam of light, as if there were some special significance to this small world; but it’s just an accident of geometry and optics. There is no sign of humans in this picture: not our reworking of the Earth’s surface; not our machines; not ourselves. From this vantage point, our obsession with nationalisms is nowhere in evidence. We are too small. On the scale of worlds, humans are inconsequential: a thin film of life on an obscure and solitary lump of rock and metal.

Consider again that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it, everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you’ve ever heard of, every human being who ever was lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings; thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines; every hunter and forager; every hero and coward; every creator and destroyer of civilizations; every king and peasant, every young couple in love; every mother and father; hopeful child; inventor and explorer; every teacher of morals; every corrupt politician; every supreme leader; every superstar; every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there—on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.

The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena.

Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner. How frequent their misunderstandings; how eager they are to kill one another; how fervent their hatreds. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity—in all this vastness—there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. Like it or not, for the moment, the Earth is where we make our stand.

It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. It underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the only home we’ve ever known.

The pale blue dot.

R.I.P.

Selamat Jalan Gus Dur

Indonesia’s fourth president and the first to be democratically elected, Abdurrahman Wahid, fondly called Gus Dur passed away last evening. His controversial leadership of a fledgling democracy between the tumultuous years of 1999 and 2001 has been criticized as often as it has been praised, but it cannot be denied that he set Indonesia – the world’s largest Muslim nation, on a path of inclusiveness, tolerance and freedom that is, one hopes, irreversible. He leaves behind a powerful legacy of a tolerant Islam – the one he practised, preached and protected from detractors.

Gus Dur was born in an illustrious family. His father was Wahid Hasyim, a hero of Indonesia’s freedom struggle and the first Minister of Religious Affairs in the independent Indonesia. His paternal grandfather, Hasyim Asy’ari was one of the founders of Nahdlatul Ulama(NU), which is now Indonesia’s and probably the world’s largest Islamic organisation. His maternal grandfather Bisri Syansuri, was one of the first Muslim educators to introduce classes for women. With such credentials, little wonder that Gus Dur turned out to be the emancipated man that he was.

As the chairman of NU himself, and as president, Gus Dur fought for what he firmly believed was the right Islam. He had once responded to his critics who questioned his Islamic credentials thus,

“Those who say that I am not Islamic enough should reread their Koran. Islam is about inclusion, tolerance, community.”

The strength of his personal integrity and convictions is borne out by the fact that he often decided to go against popular posturing if he believed he was in the right. He was a lone voice defending author Salman Rushdie, when the entire Muslim population of the world was gunning for his blood. He also believed in reconciliation with Israel, a taboo in the Islamic world. As chairman of NU, he travelled to Israel twice, in 1994 and 1997. In 1997 he accepted a prize in Jerusalem in honour of the assassinated Israeli leader Yitzhak Rabin and signed a charter for peace promoted by the Simon Perez Institute in Tel Aviv. During the Holocaust conference in Bali, Indonesia in 2007, which took place thanks to his untiring efforts, he called Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian President, a liar for denying the Holocaust.

His gift to Indonesia’s future was his efforts at bringing the Indonesia military under civilian control and making it accountable to the people, unlike in the past. He also abolished the Ministry of Information, Suharto’s main body aimed at throttling freedom of speech. He was the first to make diplomatic overtures to the insurgents in Aceh and West Papua and displayed his willingness to silence the guns in favour of talks. He gave the Chinese Indonesian minority its voice and identity back by lifting the Suharto era ban on the display of Chinese characters and symbolism and the importing of Chinese publications. He also declared Chinese New Year as a holiday. He visited the former Indonesian territory of East Timor and apologized for Indonesian military’s atrocities and excesses during the Timorese freedom struggle. He also removed Wiranto, a former general, from his cabinet, for his alleged role in the excesses. Through these gestures, he prepared Indonesians for a democracy which enshrines religious tolerance, respect for minority rights and fundamental freedoms.

His presidency though, was marked by uncertainty and impulsive decisions. So much so that, it is reputed that a popular quip in Jakarta in those days used to be – there are three things in this world which are uncertain – life, death and Gus Dur! His tendency to fall asleep at public meetings was another infamous hallmark of his presidency! But he was always jovial and ready with a joke, a famous one being this -Indonesia’s first president, Sukarno was crazy for women; its second, Suharto was crazy for money; its third, Habibie was simply crazy; and he, the fourth just drove everyone crazy!

On a personal side, Gus Dur loved music, especially the Western Classical composer Beethoven. Once long after his presidency, he was asked about what he missed most from those days. He replied,

I don’t prize it too much. The presidency was just a task to finish. I regret more the loss of my collection of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony — 27 CD’s and tapes. The boy that was taking care of it ran away with it, and now I think it’s for sale in the market. So I regret that more. I fired him!

(Source: The New York Times – Indonesia’s Ex-President Expects to Be Restored)

Selamat jalan Gus Dur (Farewell Gus Dur). You will be missed.

(Further reading: Promoting the Good by Abdurrahman Wahid – Gus Dur’s views on Islam, Peace, Democracy and Righteousness)

All religions insist on peace. From this we might think that the religious struggle for peace is simple… but it is not. The deep problem is that people use religion wrongly in pursuit of victory and triumph. This sad fact then leads to conflict with people who have different beliefs.

“All religions insist on peace. From this we might think that the religious struggle for peace is simple… but it is not. The deep problem is that people use religion wrongly in pursuit of victory and triumph. This sad fact then leads to conflict with people who have different beliefs.”

[UPDATE: An excellent article, titled 'The blind man with 20/20 vision' from an Israeli Rabbi who personally knew him.]

Hands that serve…

Devi Shetty

A Facebook post of a friend led me to this article in The Wall Street Journal titled The Henry Ford of Heart Surgery. And through this and subsequent googling I discovered the man behind the name Dr. Devi Shetty, a name I have heard a hundred times amongst friends and family in India.

Whenever heart disease and its remedies are discussed in India this name inevitably pops up and I knew that Dr. Shetty is a famous heart surgeon who started in a hospital in Calcutta, became Mother Teresa’s doctor and then founded a couple of his own hospitals in Calcutta and Bangalore. But what I did not know are the following:

  • His Narayana Hrudayalaya hospital in Bangalore charges around $2,000 for open-heart surgery. The same operation costs around $5,000 in other Indian private hospitals and anything between $20,000 and $100,000 in the U.S.
  • Almost a third of Narayana’s patients are covered by a farmers’ insurance plan started by Dr. Shetty in partnership with the state government of Karnataka. This insurance costs just $3 a year per person and pays $1,200 for each cardiac surgery, which is lower by $300 from the hospital’s break-even cost of $1500 per operation.
  • 3,174 cardiac bypass surgeries were performed in Narayana in 2008 – a huge number, compared to the 1,367 in the renowned Cleveland Clinic, U.S.A. 2,777 operations were performed on children – Children’s Hospital Boston performed only 1,026.
  • But quality does not suffer. Narayana’s mortality rate within 30 days of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, a common procedure, is around 1.4%. The U.S. average in 2008 for the same procedure was 1.9%.
  • And they still make profits! Narayana Hrudayalaya Private Ltd., which runs the hospitals, reports a 7.7% profit after taxes. This is slightly higher than the 6.9% average for a U.S. hospital.

Astounding! And all of this is possible thanks to one man’s vision and private enterprise!

Before Devi Shetty, it was considered impossible to drive down costs to such levels; even now, no one has been able to replicate this. Top-flight management researchers want to understand how Shetty does it. “The mortality rate in Narayana Hrudyalaya is much lower than in New York State for similar kinds of heart disease,” says University of Michigan’s C.K. Prahalad. The hospital has been discussed extensively in his 2004 bestseller, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. It has also become a case study at Harvard Business School. Adds Kokila P. Doshi, professor of Economics at University of San Diego’s business school, “Till now the trend was that government serves the poor. Shetty has shown that private enterprise can serve the poor profitably.”

Forbes India - The World’s Largest Heart Factory

The WSJ article reports that a couple of Mother Teresa’s pictures adorn the walls of Dr. Shetty’s office. One of them has the following words,

Hands that serve are more sacred than lips that pray.

Additional Link:

Forbes India Slideshow – Day in the life of Devi Shetty

(Photo courtesy Narayana Hospitals)

(Thanks PD for the WSJ link!)

The Mahatma

As a rule I never post twice in a day. My output, as it is, is not mighty prolific! So if I happen to have two good ideas on the same day, I save one for later or if I do write it down, I schedule the post for another day. But today is different – today is the birthday of M. K. Gandhi – the Mahatma – Bapu. And apart from the previous post, which was scheduled(!), this one is in remembrance.

First up – Google pays tribute to the Apostle of Peace through this Google Doodle which appears on the Google India and Google UK pages.

Gandhi_GoogleDoodle

Next, Obama, on the way to Copenhagen, issued a special message of commemoration for the occasion.

“On behalf of the American people, I want to express appreciation for the life and lessons of Mahatma Gandhi on the anniversary of his birth. This is an important moment to reflect on his message of non-violence, which continues to inspire people and political movements across the globe.”

Obama’s admiration for Gandhi is well-known. During the run-up to last year’s Presidential Election, it was revealed that he had a portrait of the Mahatma at his Senate Office. Also recently, when he was asked by a 9th grader at the Wakefield High School, Arlington, Virginia, about who he would chose if he could have dinner with anyone, dead or alive, his answer was,

I think that it might be Gandhi, who is a real hero of mine. Now, it would probably be a really small meal because — (laughter) — he didn’t eat a lot. But he’s somebody who I find a lot of inspiration in. He inspired Dr. King, so if it hadn’t been for the non-violent movement in India, you might not have seen the same non-violent movement for civil rights here in the United States. He inspired César Chávez, and he — and what was interesting was that he ended up doing so much and changing the world just by the power of his ethics, by his ability to change how people saw each other and saw themselves — and help people who thought they had no power realize that they had power, and then help people who had a lot of power realize that if all they’re doing is oppressing people, then that’s not a really good exercise of power.

Wakefield High School
Arlington, Virginia

In today’s message he speaks about America’s debt to the Mahatma (“Americans owe an enormous measure of gratitude to the Mahatma.”), especially for the inspiration for the non-violent Civil Rights Movement led by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Dr. King had this to say on All India Radio on March 9, 1959 during his month-long visit to India, which affected him “in a profound way, deepening his understanding of non-violent resistance and his commitment to America’s struggle for civil rights” (Wikipedia),

May I also say that, since being in India, I am more convinced than ever before that the method of non-violent resistance is the most potent weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for justice and human dignity. In a real sense, Mahatma Gandhi embodied in his life certain universal principles that are inherent in the moral structure of the universe, and these principles are as inescapable as the law of gravitation.

To continue with the tributes, here are some of my favourite remarks and observations on Gandhi made by other global figures.

To start off, here is Einstein‘s observations on Gandhi. I love the last bit – “a man who has confronted the brutality of Europe with the dignity of the simple human being, and thus at all times risen superior“.

“A leader of his people, unsupported by any outward authority; a politician whose success rests not upon craft nor mastery of technical devices, but simply on the convincing power of his personality; a victorious fighter who has always scorned the use of force; a man of wisdom and humility, armed with resolve and inflexible consistency, who has devoted all his strength to the uplifting of his people and the betterment of their lot; a man who has confronted the brutality of Europe with the dignity of the simple human being, and thus at all times risen superior.”

Romain Rolland, the French author, was acutely aware how Gandhi, a non-Christian lived the ideals of Christ more than any Christian ever.

“Gandhi is not only for India a hero of national history, whose legendary memory will be enshrined in the millennial epoch. Gandhi has renewed, for all the peoples of the West, the message of their Christ, forgotten or betrayed.”

Dr. King recognized this as well.

“Gandhi was probably the first person in history to lift the love ethic of Jesus above mere interaction between individuals to a powerful and effective social force on a large scale.”

Lord Richard Attenborough, the director of Gandhi, quotes the Mahatma himself in order to explain the essence of the Mahatma’s message of non-violence.

“When asked what attribute he most admired in human nature, Mahatma Gandhi replied, simply and immediately, ‘Courage’. ‘Nonviolence’, he said, ‘is not to be used ever as the shield of the coward. It is the weapon of the brave.”

And finally Edward R. Murrow, an American radio newsman, reporting from the Mahatma’s funeral, sums up his life thus,

The object of this massive tribute died as he had always lived – a private man without wealth, without property, without official title or office. Mahatma Gandhi was not the commander of great armies nor a ruler of vast lands. He could not boast any scientific achievement or artistic gift. Yet men, governments and dignitaries from all over the world have joined hands today to pay homage to this little brown man in the loincloth who led his country to freedom. In the words of General George C. Marshall, the American Secretary of State, “Mahatma Gandhi had become the spokesman for the conscience of all mankind. He was a man who made humility and simple truth more powerful than empires.” And Albert Einstein added, “Generations to come, it may be, will scarce believe that such one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.”

The last words, where he quotes Einstein, are well-known. Einstein had got it right, it seems, about how difficult it will be for people in the future to believe that there was such a man in our midst, and it did not take too many generations either.

And to end tonight I present an article that the famous novelist George Orwell wrote for Partisan Review in January, 1949. In his own words, Orwell was no fan of Gandhi. He says quite frankly, “I have never been able to feel much liking for Gandhi”. But in an unbiased, rational analysis of the man even he admits, ”His character was an extraordinarily mixed one, but there was almost nothing in it that you can put your finger on and call bad, and I believe that even Gandhi’s worst enemies would admit that he was an interesting and unusual man who enriched the world simply by being alive.”

Love him, hate him – you can’t escape the fact that this ‘half-naked fakir’ (in the words of Sir Winston Churchill!) was one of the most extraordinary men that ever lived. In Orwell’s words,
“One may feel, as I do, a sort of aesthetic distaste for Gandhi, one may reject the claims of sainthood made on his behalf (he never made any such claim himself, by the way), one may also reject sainthood as an ideal and therefore feel that Gandhi’s basic aims were anti-human and reactionary: but regarded simply as a politician, and compared with the other leading political figures of our time, how clean a smell he has managed to leave behind!”
Gandhi

Dr. Binayak Sen

BinayakSen.jpg

- Dr. Binayak Sen helped to set up the Chhattisgarh Mukti Morcha’s Shaheed Hospital, a pioneering health programme for the region. The hospital is owned and operated by a workers’ organization for the benefit of all, regardless of caste or any other background.
- Dr. Sen and his wife, Dr. Ilina Sen, are the founders of Rupantar, a community-based nongovernmental organization that has trained, deployed and monitored the work of community health workers spread throughout 20 villages. Rupantar’s activities include initiatives to counter alcohol abuse and violence against women, and to promote food security.
- Dr Sen was the recipient in 2004 of the Paul Harrison award for a lifetime of service to the rural poor. This award is given annually by the prestigious Christian Medical College in Vellore, India, to one of its alumni.
- Dr. Sen was awarded the R.R. Keithan Gold Medal by The Indian Academy of Social Sciences (ISSA) on 31 December 2007. The citation describes him as “one of the most eminent scientists” of India. “The award is for his outstanding contribution to the advancement of science of Nature-Man-Society and his honest and sincere application for the improvement of quality of life of the poor, the downtrodden and the oppressed people of Chhattisgarh.” His “suffering and personal risk” would inspire scientists as well as the general public for a very long time, according to the citation.
- Dr. Sen has been selected for the highest international honour in Global Health and Human Rights, the Jonathan Mann Award for 2008, established by the Global Health Council. The Global Health Council issued a public statement, “This 58-year-old pediatrician was selected by an international jury of public health professionals for this prestigious award because of his years of service to poor and tribal communities in India, his effective leadership in establishing self-sustaining health care services where none existed, and his unwavering commitment to civil liberties and human rights.
Now one would ask what is a person of his stature doing in jail? Dr. Sen was arrested in May 2007 and has spent a year in jail, most of it without trial. Though the trial is now underway, there are growing, legitimate fears about the fairness of the exercise. He has been accused of links with the Maoists on the basis of a fully above board, legitimate, supervised visit to a Naxal leader, Narayan Sanyal in prison, who he had been treating medically. But the real reason, as pointed out by several prominent figures including Noam Chomsky in a press statement, is for speaking out against “…fake encounters, rapes, burning of villages and displacement of adivasis [indigenous tribals] in tens of thousands and consequent loss of livelihoods…”, all carried out by the state machinery.
What the Maoists have done, as Dr. Sen believes, is that they “have tapped into a groundswell of legitimate grievances”.(BBC – Dr Binayak Sen: Tribal doctor) But he has never supported Maoist violence. (“I have never condoned Maoist violence. It is an invalid and unsustainable movement.” – Tehelka magazine)
So let us now look at the whole situation in perspective. People at the very margins of society, desperately poor people, people who have been ignored by the government for decades are inspired by a group of rebels to take up arms and carry on a violent struggle. There are also human rights activists who have been working with these same poor people to bring about change but in a non-violent manner. Ideally the government should engage these activists, provide them support so that the non-violent means to improve the lives of these people get a boost and the justification of taking up arms is defeated. Then the government could deal with the rebels in a manner it deems fit, but again without excesses. Instead here we have the government violently crushing the rebels, often using extra-legal methods of government-armed vigilantes, putting the non-violent activists behind bars and probably doing all it can to maintain the status quo, which also means maintaining the people in poverty. And all this is happening in the country which prides itself to be the world’s largest democracy.
For a clearer picture of Dr. Sen, his activities, his arrest and trial, the international support that he keeps getting etc. please do read the Wikipedia article on him. For news about efforts to get him out of prison, visit www.freebinayaksen.org. For an article by Dr. P Zachariah, the retired Head of Physiology at the Christian Medical College, Vellore in which he examines the life of his former student read this article in Tehelka titled “A Prize For The Prisoner“.
(Primary Source: Wikipedia – Binayak Sen)

Manipur – III

Sharmila’s struggle continues
image
Sharmila taken to Delhi after summons
Sharmila was selected for South Korea’s Gwangju award for human rights this year.
“What I want is not awards, but withdrawal of the act which is responsible for violation of human rights by security forces”.
(The Gwangju award is awarded by the Gwangju Asian Human Rights Folk School, a South Korean human rights body to mark the protest against military rule in South Korea on May 18, 1980 in which over 200 people were killed)
Her brother, Singhajit received the award on her behalf in Seoul on May 18. Sharmila completed 2,400 days of her fast-unto-death that day.
Related Posts:

Dr Kotnis ki Amar Kahani

drkotnis.jpg

Dr Kotnis ki Amar Kahani is a Hindi film released in 1946 directed by V. Shantaram (he also played the title role). The film is based on the true story of Dwarkanath Kotnis, one of five Indian physicians dispatched to China to provide medical assistance during the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1938.

I saw an article on a Chinese website about him, which says-

“No single Indian has been more revered by ordinary Chinese than a doctor from a middle class family in northern India. On the day when the Chinese pay respect to their ancestors, the grave of this doctor on the plains of North China is covered with flowers donated by the local Chinese.”

This would be such a shining example of Sino-Indian friendship and collaboration.

Manipur – II

Irom Chanu Sharmila
I had talked about the Manipur situation in an earlier post. I had talked about Irom Chanu Sharmila. I said “The demand for this Act to be repealed and her non-violent methods in support would do the Mahatma proud.”

Well interestingly she has a similar idea:
“I want to tell the people of India that if Mahatma Gandhi were alive today, he would have launched a movement against the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act.”

Read it in The Telegraph…

Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan

A familiar name, at least till our generation – Frontier Gandhi, as he was popularly known in India. When he received the Bharat Ratna, I was in school probably and we knew him as a Pathan Gandhian. A contradiction? Not according to him - 

“There is nothing surprising in a Muslim or a pathan like me subscribing to the creed of nonviolence. It is not a new creed. It was followed 1,400 years ago by the Prophet all the time when He was in Mecca.”

How many of us are aware that he was not someone who was influenced by Gandhi? That his principles of non-violence were shaped through his own experiences and independent of the Mahatma? In these troubled times of Islamist extremism isn’t it befitting that such a man be remembered? And let it be known to the world that this is Islam and not the televised beheadings…
Do your bit here. And to learn more about him here are a few options…
3. This is interesting since it is an Afghan website. If you are as interested as me to get as many sides to every story as possible…